Comments on: Verification Methodology Poll Results http://theasicguy.com/2009/02/11/verification-methodology-poll-results/ sharing insights into the people side of ASIC design Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:34:44 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2 By: harry http://theasicguy.com/2009/02/11/verification-methodology-poll-results/#comment-2365 harry Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:39:06 +0000 http://theasicguy.com/2009/02/11/verification-methodology-poll-results/#comment-2365 Hi Brian, Yeah, I had left it out by mistake. I think it's grown in popularity due to TLM 2.0 since I did this survey almost 2 years ago, so I'd want to include it today. Thanks, Harry Hi Brian,

Yeah, I had left it out by mistake. I think it’s grown in popularity due to TLM 2.0 since I did this survey almost 2 years ago, so I’d want to include it today.

Thanks,

Harry

]]> By: harry http://theasicguy.com/2009/02/11/verification-methodology-poll-results/#comment-2364 harry Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:38:15 +0000 http://theasicguy.com/2009/02/11/verification-methodology-poll-results/#comment-2364 Hi Brian, Yeah, that was my oversight at the time. I think it's grown in popularity due to TLM 2.0 since I did this survey almost 2 years ago, so I'd want to include it today. Thanks, Harry Hi Brian,

Yeah, that was my oversight at the time. I think it’s grown in popularity due to TLM 2.0 since I did this survey almost 2 years ago, so I’d want to include it today.

Thanks,

Harry

]]> By: Brian http://theasicguy.com/2009/02/11/verification-methodology-poll-results/#comment-2362 Brian Tue, 14 Dec 2010 08:49:47 +0000 http://theasicguy.com/2009/02/11/verification-methodology-poll-results/#comment-2362 SystemC is neglected? SystemC is neglected?

]]> By: GopiKrishna http://theasicguy.com/2009/02/11/verification-methodology-poll-results/#comment-521 GopiKrishna Mon, 16 Mar 2009 08:52:43 +0000 http://theasicguy.com/2009/02/11/verification-methodology-poll-results/#comment-521 On what bases should I consider word "Market share" ? based on the number of users or based on the Number of companies. On what bases should I consider word “Market share” ? based on the number of users or based on the Number of companies.

]]> By: harry http://theasicguy.com/2009/02/11/verification-methodology-poll-results/#comment-479 harry Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:52:12 +0000 http://theasicguy.com/2009/02/11/verification-methodology-poll-results/#comment-479 Hi Jeremy, It's hard to say. One could speculate that indeed the native SV is under-represented, as well as native verilog and VHDL. Seeing as this poll was likely to hit those who are early adopters, that would make sense. I need to also point out that there was no category for SystemC/C/C++ which was my oversight. I received a few comments that this was missing and it seems those people voted in "other". Harry Hi Jeremy,

It’s hard to say. One could speculate that indeed the native SV is under-represented, as well as native verilog and VHDL. Seeing as this poll was likely to hit those who are early adopters, that would make sense.

I need to also point out that there was no category for SystemC/C/C++ which was my oversight. I received a few comments that this was missing and it seems those people voted in “other”.

Harry

]]> By: Jeremy Ralph http://theasicguy.com/2009/02/11/verification-methodology-poll-results/#comment-478 Jeremy Ralph Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:12:59 +0000 http://theasicguy.com/2009/02/11/verification-methodology-poll-results/#comment-478 Harry, you've put a lot of work into this. Interesting that the results align with Gary Smith's market share reports, which is likely no coincidence. Since the big EDA vendors "solicited their supporters to vote," I wonder if that causes the native SV camp to be under represented and the *VMs to be over-represented. Harry, you’ve put a lot of work into this. Interesting that the results align with Gary Smith’s market share reports, which is likely no coincidence.

Since the big EDA vendors “solicited their supporters to vote,” I wonder if that causes the native SV camp to be under represented and the *VMs to be over-represented.

]]>